United Liberty
John Paul Stevens
On Every Question of Construction

A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

eDWYFDqI DORKING D6604 eDWYFDqI SHOES FOR WOMEN SHOES WOMEN 1bca34c
Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

“It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

— Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
nOpPGZ04 DORKING 5794 SHOES FOR WOMEN , nNGV2oSy PITILLOS 1275 SHOES FOR WOMEN , AntZHxTO SKECHERS 14921 SLIP-ON PARA MUJER , 5TYtavFb PITILLOS 1322 SHOES FOR WOMENeZGK04Jf STROVER 17661 SHOES FOR WOMEN , bnMvzFWM SKECHERS 14145 SLIP-ON PARA MUJER1ueR6tX9 NIVAL Carmen SHOES FOR WOMEN , hWcFWGDm HISPANITAS Hi75886 SHOES FOR WOMENV27ZZuQh HISPANITAS Hv86724 SHOES FOR WOMEN , wJKaoFlj CALLAGHAN 98737 SHOES FOR WOMENoSBVWNYR CALLAGHAN 98700 SHOES FOR WOMENeU9JSvAg HISPANITAS Hi75715 SHOES FOR WOMEN , qy55UK0w CALLAGHAN 11603 SLIP-ON PARA MUJER , drnCpvFx APLAUSO 1005 SHOES FOR WOMEN , f8yywa3i GIKO 47001 SHOES FOR WOMEN , uP7BUxIG AEROBICS 5498 SLIP-ON PARA MUJER , lHQ0ZvKx APLAUSO 31223 SHOES FOR WOMENYF03bOYO VEXED 17470 SHOES FOR WOMEN , FHtNMTsZ GIKO 23777 SHOES FOR WOMEN , YBKrjx7E VEXED 17497 SHOES FOR WOMEN , D407R5GB DANSI 8502 MULES PARA MUJER , R8KPEL1R GEOX D828lc ZAPATILLA CON PLATAFORMAfd9eHRJP SKECHERS 12757 TRAINERS FOR WOMEN , VVNw2gSX STROVER 18254 MULES PARA MUJER , Ed80hfbt OTAZUA 8704 SHOES FOR WOMEN , js8pSGZt VEXED 17494 SHOES FOR WOMENP0YovGmh VANS S034503800bvn HIGH-TOP TRAINERSFOR WOMENLNu0OhhE STROVER San054 MULES PARA MUJER , fUQ1bVIA VANS S034500015bva ZAPATILLA CON PLATAFORMA ,
John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

Premiata Ankle Boot - Women Premiata Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11500372LS , Liu •Jo Sandals - Women Liu •Jo Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11537946RT , womens Alexander Wang Red Pumps superiorOvye' By Cristina Lucchi Sandals - Women Ovye' By Cristina Lucchi Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11374792GO181 By Alberto Gozzi Court - Women 181 By Alberto Gozzi Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11233706RUJeffrey Campbell Ankle Boot - Women Jeffrey Campbell Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11212075CUPuma AVID NETFIT - Trainers Colour: black/ribbon red/whitemens/womens Steve Madden Wright Loafers Packaging diversity , men's/women's Giuseppe Zanotti E800106 Heels Year-end saleTiger of Sweden SINENSIS - Trainers , Shepherd SILVIA - Slippers Colour: cremeSkechers Sport FLEX ADVANTAGE 3.0 - Trainers - blackmen/women Levi's? SKINNER - Trainers fashionablePanama Jack PIOLA - Platform boots Colour: black , Ghōud Venice Sneakers - Men Ghōud Venice Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11545423BIHogan Rebel Sneakers - Men Hogan Rebel Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11217944MDNovesta Sneakers - Women Novesta Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11156667LE , Munich Sneakers - Women Munich Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11423646TF , Next Ankle Boot - Women Next Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11018816MWPedro García Sandals - Women Pedro García Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11572378DI , Corvari Ankle Boot - Women Corvari Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11546852RSRick Owens Boots - Women Rick Owens Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11513232IKX7IfrkJt Bogs Auburn Slip-On Boot Rubber , U2W3PL5S Foot Petals Dual TT Porondurability Asolo Patrol GV MM , Medium cost Stacy Adams Logan , LADY Dior Pink / White Sneakers Special promotions at the end of the yearWOMEN Valentino Metalic Gold Rockstud Sandals Crazy Price, BirminghamWomen's Christian Louboutin Black Dorocora Pumps in short supplyBlack White Spike and Sparkle Slip On Sneakers ,
Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.