United Liberty
  • Log in
  • Create Account
  • John Paul Stevens
    On Every Question of Construction

    A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

    As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

    Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

    Versace United Court - Women Women Versace 21988 Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11567110VP 6465631
    Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

    “It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

    — Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

    Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
    Vans Sneakers - Women Vans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11338959XDKhrio' Sandals - Women Khrio' Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11326962KXEspadrilles Espadrilles - Women Espadrilles Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11424654GUMelissa Sandals - Women Melissa Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11378106XC , Cult Sandals - Women Cult Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11379361UWVans Sneakers - Women Vans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11429561BJ , Puma Sneakers - Women Puma Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11327235QF , Lumberjack Sneakers - Women Lumberjack Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11197858QV , Mjus Espadrilles - Women Mjus Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11419315IU , Espadrilles Espadrilles - Women Espadrilles Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11457122JN , Vans Espadrilles - Women Vans Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11191126GNKanna Espadrilles - Women Kanna Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11405584MU , Fornarina Sandals - Women Fornarina Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11113925MR , Gaimo Espadrilles - Women Gaimo Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11380762JAEspadrilles Espadrilles - Women Espadrilles Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11394811ILSuperga® Espadrilles - Women Superga® Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11207935HWCult Sandals - Women Cult Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11420628ERCafènoir Boots - Women Cafènoir Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11560796GOSalomon Sneakers - Women Salomon Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11399357UJVans Sneakers - Women Vans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11234603TVPuma Sneakers - Women Puma Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11326428KX , Prism Espadrilles - Women Prism Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11330362LHCuoieria Espadrilles - Women Cuoieria Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11363907HOGióel Sandals - Women Gióel Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11384051ABUnisa Espadrilles - Women Unisa Espadrilles online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11333174WB , Melissa Sandals - Women Melissa Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11418057HSE...Vee Loafers - Women E...Vee Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11379519BLVans Sneakers - Women Vans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11393735KSSantoni Loafers - Women Santoni Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11387788TV
    John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

    As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

    John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

    Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

    Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

    Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

    Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

    Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

    Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

    Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

    Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

    Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

    Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

    Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

    Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

    Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

    Alexander Mcqueen Ankle Boot - Women Alexander Mcqueen Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11461103ON , Blugirl Blumarine Ankle Boot - Women Blugirl Blumarine Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11260757XDEmanuela Passeri Ankle Boot - Women Emanuela Passeri Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11444495RUOTAZUA 692091 SANDALIA PLANA DE MUJERCLARKS Un Geo Lo LOW-TOP TRAINERS , Ladies Chocolat Blu Turquoise Wedges Reasonable delivery and punctual delivery , CLARKS Money Whistle FASHION ANKLE BOOTS FOR WOMENStuart Weitzman White Nappa Spa Crossover Slide Sandals , MISS Hermès Brown Python Oasis Sandals Call first , GERRY WEBER G39920 FASHION FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN , mens/womens KIOMI Slip-ons Colour: brown fine , Men/Women Pelle Moda Vail Heels Customer first , mens/womens ALDO Yaowien Oxfords Not so expensiveman/woman Sanuk Pick Pocket Loafers First batch of customersASOS DESIGN | ASOS DESIGN Explorer suede ankles boots , Casadei Sneakers - Men Casadei Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11451031KJ , men/women Rieker R3428 Liv 28 Sneakers & Athletic Rieker High gradeSaucony FREEDOM ISO 2 - Neutral running shoes - vizired/blackCesare Paciotti Loafers - Men Cesare Paciotti Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11505054VJAdidas Originals Sneakers - Men Adidas Originals Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11535262QP , man/woman Nike Golf Lunar Command 2 Sneakers & Athletic Nike Golf Elegant appearanceJeannot Sneakers - Women Jeannot Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11228802JTReplay Court - Women Replay Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11105526OT , Msgm Sneakers - Women Msgm Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11376936BVPura López Court - Women Pura López Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11323147PVTrussardi Jeans Sneakers - Women Trussardi Jeans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11467856VK , Pedro García Sandals - Women Pedro García Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11573780KV , Contrary to the same paragraph Salomon Quest Prime GTXLADY Tory Burch Red Thong Sandals The color is very noticeable , woman Stella McCartney Brown Nathalie Wedges At a lower price
    Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
    BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

    Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

    Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

    At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

    Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

    Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


    The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.