United Liberty
  • Log in
  • Create Account
  • John Paul Stevens
    On Every Question of Construction

    A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

    As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

    Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

    Pony Sneakers - 11252629JQ Men 1576 Pony Sneakers online Pony on YOOX United Kingdom - 11252629JQ 996bd4e
    Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

    “It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

    — Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

    Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
    Byblos Sneakers - Men Byblos Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11485011KV , Byblos Sneakers - Men Byblos Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11485078GCMerrell Sneakers - Men Merrell Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11472602IX , Springa Sneakers - Men Springa Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 44957188HGL4k3 Sneakers - Men L4k3 Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11530418SHValsport Sneakers - Men Valsport Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11474931WO , Quattrobarradodici Sneakers - Men Quattrobarradodici Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11457085GW , Quattrobarradodici Sneakers - Men Quattrobarradodici Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11458805MP , Colmar Sneakers - Men Colmar Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11474643OK , Msgm Sneakers - Men Msgm Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11500856WR , Munich Sneakers - Men Munich Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11454765DH , J.Wilton Loafers - Men J.Wilton Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11481003VS , Adidas Sneakers - Men Adidas Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11494142OIButtero® Sneakers - Men Buttero® Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11422003RKSaucony Sneakers - Men Saucony Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11263826TK , Bikkembergs Sneakers - Men Bikkembergs Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11461970FK , Munich Sneakers - Men Munich Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11454597JP , Saucony Sneakers - Men Saucony Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11467293RG , Disney Sneakers - Men Disney Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11510647JN , Byblos Sneakers - Men Byblos Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11485016KPEleventy Loafers - Men Eleventy Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11311382PGJp/David Loafers - Men Jp/David Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11506303NP , Santoni Loafers - Men Santoni Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11478599BD , Doucal's Loafers - Men Doucal's Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11505569KFSantoni Loafers - Men Santoni Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11488718VNAsfvlt Boots - Men Asfvlt Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11431448CRNike Sneakers - Men Nike Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11509869NB , Zespà Sneakers - Men Zespà Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11486039BU , Buttero® Sneakers - Men Buttero® Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11164066UK
    John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

    As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

    John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

    Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

    Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

    Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

    Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

    Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

    Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

    Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

    Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

    Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

    Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

    Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

    Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

    Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

    Vans Ua Sk8-Hi - Sneakers - Men Vans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11183983IO , Golden Goose Deluxe Brand Gray Sneakers , Tipe E Tacchi Ankle Boot - Women Tipe E Tacchi Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11533364RKAdidas By Raf Simons Sneakers - Men Adidas By Raf Simons Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11501286VL , Nike Bright Crimson Purple Hyper Blue Grey Dunk Prm Low Viotec Sneakers , Women's J.Crew Colbat Blue Spadrille Wedges Win the praise of customers , WOMENS Jack Rogers Blue Sandals Practical and economicalLADY Jimmy Choo Brown Jellys Sandals Fair priceWOMENS Manolo Blahnik Vintage Rose Sandals Nice , mens/womens Bella-Vita Isabelle Heels Seasonal hot sale , Adidas X 18.3 Firm Ground Boots , RAID LIONA - Platform sandals , ASOS DESIGN | ASOS DESIGN Ray chunky zip bootsKENDALL + KYLIE FINIGAN - Classic ankle boots , El Naturalista RICEFIELD - Ankle strap ballet pumpsT.U.K Loafers - Women T.U.K Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11528155HC , men/women Sam Edelman Damian Oxfords Contrary to the same paragraphStuart Weitzman Sandals - Women Stuart Weitzman Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11584224DL , Strategia Ankle Boot - Women Strategia Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11515292KP , Luca Valentini Sneakers - Women Luca Valentini Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11513719LTImma Albergo Boots - Women Imma Albergo Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11471098XUVicini Tapeet Boots - Women Vicini Tapeet Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11311997WVHogan Ballet Flats - Women Hogan Ballet Flats online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11036208LJOrder welcome Miz Mooz ShayModerate cost EVOLV Cruzer Psychelady Nike Grey Internationalist Sneakers Highly praised and appreciated by the audience of consumersDonald J. Pliner Black Silver Shades Of Beads Beaded Fifi Wedge SandalsJimmy Choo Black Annie 100 Feather Sequin Satin Heelsx (129357) Sandalsladies Red/Orange/Silver 833385606 Sneakers First in his class , LADY Valentino Pink Rockstud Cage Pumps Low price ,
    Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
    BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

    Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

    Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

    At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

    Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

    Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


    The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.