United Liberty
  • Log in
  • Create Account
  • John Paul Stevens
    On Every Question of Construction

    A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

    As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

    Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

    Diesel brisbanech-26827 Sneakers - 26827 Women YOOX Diesel Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11476610VS 5a89f46
    Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

    “It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

    — Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

    Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
    Pinko Sandals - Women Pinko Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11361153SO , Superga® Sneakers - Women Superga® Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11155886QM , Geox Court - Women Geox Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 44648961XU , Diesel Sneakers - Women Diesel Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11476602XS , Diesel Sneakers - Women Diesel Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11476604SI , Tod's Sneakers - Women Tod's Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11193215NNLumberjack Sneakers - Women Lumberjack Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11454896VI , Puma Sneakers - Women Puma Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11559172DEPuma Sneakers - Women Puma Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11559178ME , Lumberjack Sandals - Women Lumberjack Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11570320NW , Lumberjack Sneakers - Women Lumberjack Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11441541HB , Gioseppo Sandals - Women Gioseppo Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11575608DA , Geox Loafers - Women Geox Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11540553NP , Fitflop Sandals - Women Fitflop Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11574833XPPuma Sneakers - Women Puma Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11559246IC , Lumberjack Sandals - Women Lumberjack Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11570433LB , Tod's Loafers - Women Tod's Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11567936LNPinko Sneakers - Women Pinko Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11531166MLSuperga® Sneakers - Women Superga® Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11281221FS , Geox Court - Women Geox Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11498994OG , Stiù Court - Women Stiù Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11461484AUGioseppo Sneakers - Women Gioseppo Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11575829SADiesel Sneakers - Women Diesel Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11535706VE , Lumberjack Sneakers - Women Lumberjack Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11320909EBDiesel Sneakers - Women Diesel Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11491458PRFitflop Sandals - Women Fitflop Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11575109KK , Puma Sneakers - Women Puma Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11559420LD , Geox Court - Women Geox Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11540479MA , Superga® Sneakers - Women Superga® Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11206137PU
    John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

    As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

    John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

    Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

    Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

    Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

    Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

    Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

    Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

    Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

    Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

    Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

    Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

    Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

    Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

    Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

    Mcq Alexander Mcqueen Court - Women Mcq Alexander Mcqueen Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11473486PCNorma J.Baker Ankle Boot - Women Norma J.Baker Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11316107LM , MARIAN 9606 FASHION BALLERINAS FOR WOMENlady Coclico Green Wedges Online salesAdidas Originals By Jeremy Scott Sneakers - Men Adidas Originals By Jeremy Scott Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11108917WH , WOMENS Jimmy Choo Camel Color Wedges New product , mens/womens Ben Sherman Barnet Oxfords Different goods , man/woman LifeStride Maximize Boots Online ShoppingBreakpoint ox trainers , black/white, Converse , men's/women's Cole Haan Yuliana Pump Heels Very good color , adidas Originals CONTINENTAL 80S - Trainers - sefrye/scarle/conavyMen/Women Crocs Isabella Strappy Sandal Sandals Year-end saleadidas Originals NMD_R1 - Trainers - offwhite/red , Adidas Nike Sportswear COURT ROYALE SUEDE - Trainers - sequoia/light brownSalomon X ULTRA 3 GTX - Hiking shoes - phantom/magnet/quiet shade , Giuseppe Zanotti Sneakers - Men Giuseppe Zanotti Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11446095HK , Cuplé Court - Women Cuplé Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11542998QADsquared2 Sneakers - Women Dsquared2 Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11566936OH , Hogan Rebel Court - Women Hogan Rebel Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11045051CB , Alberto Guardiani Sneakers - Women Alberto Guardiani Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11561541OW , Ruco Line Sneakers - Women Ruco Line Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11477347AV , WOMEN Black Predictions Wedges Many varietiesonline shop Rockport Works More Energy , First quality Reebok Print Run 3.0 , LifeStride Paloma Pair the LifeStride Paloma ankle bootie with your fave cut-offs or leggings for a totally trending lookr2AbP4lM Women's Tan Tira Wedges Affordablelady Hermès Brown Studded Oran Sandals Highly appreciated and widely trusted in and out , Stella McCartney Metallic Silver Faux Leather Indium Elyse Star Platform Derby SneakersWOMEN Zara Black Basic Collection Sneakers Low costslady Multicolor Lolita Botti Embellished Sandals First quality
    Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
    BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

    Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

    Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

    At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

    Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

    Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


    The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.