United Liberty
John Paul Stevens
On Every Question of Construction

A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

Via Spiga Msrp Red 26864 Cross Msrp Leesa Criss Cross Ankle Strap Sandals 0064215
Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

“It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

— Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
Calvin Klein Black Rinona Toe Ring / 40 Eu SandalsPhilippe Model New Women Pointed Flat Slingback Yellow 37.5 Sandals , Etienne Aigner Brown Woven Open Toe Slip-on Flip Flops SandalsUnisa Fuschia Leather Kitten Heels with Bling Mules W/ Sandals , Robert Clergerie Brown Zola Tasseled Python-embossed Leather Es 39.5 SandalsSam Edelman Turquoise 'laurel' Suede Flip Flop Espadrille 8m SandalsTwelfth St. by Cynthia Vincent Brandy Leif Mini Wedge SandalsSixtyseven Brandy Bohemian Nibu Vachetta Leather Gladiators In 39 SandalsBCBGeneration Bcbg Tryxie Tan Green & Silver Metallic Wedge Sandals , Gentle Souls New Gold Snakeskin Design Lily Moon Wedge Sandals , N°21 Fuchsia Pink Crystal Studded Satin Raso Knotted Slides Sandals , Dr. Scholl's Silver/Sparkly J. Crew 3518 Glitter Hologram Slides SandalsCalvin Klein Brown Jupare Platform Espadrille 187 Almond Tan SandalsCalvin Klein Brown Jupare Platform Espadrille 098 Almond Tan Sandals , Calvin Klein Brown Jupare Platform Espadrille 284 Almond Tan Sandals , Calvin Klein Brown Jupare Platform Espadrille 287 Almond Tan SandalsCalvin Klein Black Jupare Platform Espadrille 418 / 38 SandalsCalvin Klein Brown Jupare Platform Espadrille 579 Almond Tan Sandals , Calvin Klein Black Jupare Platform Espadrille 416 / 39 Sandals , Robert Clergerie Camel Amber Leather Platform Slides W/White Stitching Sandals , Calvin Klein Brown Jupare Platform Espadrille 508 Almond Tan Sandals , Calvin Klein Black Jupare Platform Espadrille 420 / 39 Sandals , Calvin Klein Brown Jupare Platform Espadrille 554 Almond Tan Sandals , Calvin Klein Black Hope Slide 267 / 38.5 Eu SandalsCalvin Klein Black Hope Slide 544 / 36.5 Eu Sandals , Kendall + Kylie Black Vira Flat Slide 300 Suede SandalsMarc by Marc Jacobs White "Miss Rubber Wedge Thongs Sandals , Miu Miu Red Leather Slip On Strappy Open Toe Sandals , Andre Assous Pink Sariah Espadrilles Slide 332 Blush Suede Sandals
John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

Sergio Rossi Ankle Boot - Women Sergio Rossi Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11320268HBAlberto Guardiani Ankle Boot - Women Alberto Guardiani Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11331730MICult Ankle Boot - Women Cult Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11500898MF , Manolo Blahnik Pink Slingback Pumps Sandals , Via Vela 14 Open-Toe Mules - Women Via Vela 14 Open-Toe Mules online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11542698WS , ladies ALDO Fuchsia Pink 23 Wedges Special promotions at the end of the year , ladies Juicy Couture Sandals Has a long reputation , WOMENS Jack Rogers Multicolor Navajo Sandals Elegant , Dr. Martens Beaumann Cross Strap Boot w/ Chainman/woman Gabor Gabor 75.360 Heels Special purchaseSuperga | Superga 2750 Canvas Sneakers In Pink , Alma en Pena Classic ankle boots Colour: black , men's/women's Sam Edelman Leya Sneakers & Athletic Sam Edelman Elegant appearanceAdidas Originals Sneakers - Men Adidas Originals Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11429298EUArfango Court - Women Arfango Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11475302EL , Vans Sneakers - Women Vans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11475914WX , Stele Boots - Women Stele Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11454572NCLove Moschino Sneakers - Women Love Moschino Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11488908AXGarrice Open-Toe Mules - Women Garrice Open-Toe Mules online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11300767JVMassimo Santini Sneakers - Women Massimo Santini Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11499694HX , Diadora Heritage Sneakers - Women Diadora Heritage Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11115494TU , Norma J.Baker Sandals - Women Norma J.Baker Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11562549XN , Hogan Ballet Flats - Women Hogan Ballet Flats online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11567622GF , mmRji1s5 Bottega Veneta Chet Intrecciato Loafer , Very practical Sperry A/O 2-Eye Washable , WOMENS Dolce&Gabbana Green D&g Multicolor Sandals Highly praised and appreciated by the audience of consumers , adidas White Tan Beige Light Gray Yeezy Boost Sneakers , Nike Bright Crimson/Black/University Red Free Flyknit 3.0 Sneakers , women Stuart Weitzman White Nudist Sandals durableLadies Elie Tahari El-danielle Pumps Latest technology
Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.