United Liberty
John Paul Stevens
On Every Question of Construction

A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

CALLAGHAN 92106 LOW-TOP LOW-TOP 23371 TRAINERS FOR 92106 WOMEN 8fe4a23
Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

“It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

— Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
NIVAL Sena WEDGE-HEEL SANDALS FOR WOMENBULLBOXER 870k56123acobk BOTíN PLANO DE MUJERNIVAL Lisboa WEDGE-HEEL SANDALS FOR WOMENBULLBOXER 434509e6lbkbktd70 BOTíN PLANO DE MUJER , ANGEL ALARCON 18339 SHOES FOR WOMENCALLAGHAN 87193 ZAPATO PLANO PARA MUJERANGEL ALARCON 18337 SHOES FOR WOMEN , DANSI 8601 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMEN , DANSI 8376 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMEN , DANSI 8325 WEDGE-HEEL SANDALS FOR WOMEN , ANGEL ALARCON 18316 SHOES FOR WOMEN , VEXED 17523 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMEN , SOMMITS 4663 WEDGE-HEEL SANDALS FOR WOMEN , TARKE 205 WEDGE-HEEL SANDALS FOR WOMENANGEL ALARCON 18392 SHOES FOR WOMEN , DANSI 8383 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMENSTROVER 66610c SANDALIA PLANA DE MUJERSTROVER 26557 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMENAPLAUSO 11543 WEDGE-HEEL SANDALS FOR WOMENUNISA Auto FASHION BALLERINAS FOR WOMENSTROVER 3101051 SANDALIA PLANA DE MUJERPEDRO MIRALLES 16282 MULES PARA MUJERSTROVER 2561 FASHION LOAFERS FOR WOMENAPLAUSO 182-132 BOTíN PLANO DE MUJERSTROVER S23047v18 SANDALIA PLANA DE MUJER , MARIA JAEN 6013 SHOES FOR WOMENSTROVER 2483 FASHION FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN , GEOX D621ob LOW-TOP TRAINERS FOR WOMENSTROVER S43233v18 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMEN
John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

Get It Ankle Boot - Women Get It Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11513099RU , Manila Grace Denim Boots - Women Manila Grace Denim Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11521221WCDr. Scholl's Roma - Original Collection , Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 34 - Sneakers - Men Nike Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11431334XP , Steve Madden Taupe Velvet Gator Platform Sneaker SneakersMARPEN Smile Blanco FASHION SLIPPERS FOR WOMEN , Women's Stella York Black Sneakers First qualityReebok Classic CLASSIC LEATHER - Trainers Colour: chalkPuma BASKET CLASSIC EUPHORIA - TrainersDockers by Gerli Trainers Colour: military greenmens/womens Nine West Lillianne Oxfords TrendyTommy Hilfiger Classic ankle bootsmens/womens The FLEXX My Crush Flats Bright colors , ONLY Play ONPSALLIE GLITTER - Sports shoes , Docksteps Boots - Men Docksteps Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11020912MU2Star Sneakers - Men 2Star Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11453477BTmens/womens New Balance T690v2 Sneakers & Athletic New Balance Speed ??refundMen/Women FitFlop Banda Micro-Crystal Sandal? Sandals At an affordable priceMarina Yachting Sneakers - Men Marina Yachting Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11483740QNGeox Sneakers - Women Geox Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11522645BFA.Testoni Sneakers - Women A.Testoni Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11508289DKKeys Sneakers - Women Keys Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11553121BEBarracuda's Collection Sneakers - Women Barracuda's Collection Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11557117SI , Fru.It Ankle Boot - Women Fru.It Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11532792VV , Elle Effe Court - Women Elle Effe Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11466061IGMadden Girl Sandals - Women Madden Girl Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11570206JKAlexander Smith Sneakers - Women Alexander Smith Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11527000PTWomen's Valentino Orange New Sandals tenderCole Haan Black/Tan Leather 2.5" Heel Strappy Sandalslady Black Leopard Sierra Sneakers Average costs
Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.