United Liberty
  • Log in
  • Create Account
  • John Paul Stevens
    On Every Question of Construction

    A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

    As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

    Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

    Chocolà Loafers - Women Loafers Chocolà Loafers online on YOOX 27000 - United Kingdom - 11526969BX ba5aa22
    Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

    “It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

    — Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

    Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
    Mally Boots - Women Mally Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11473277KK , Merygen Boots - Women Merygen Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11501614BJ , Pinko Sneakers - Women Pinko Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11434163HWBrunella Court - Women Brunella Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11537320LJMarella Court - Women Marella Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11534599OIFrau Boots - Women Frau Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11458990ADPanella Sandals - Women Panella Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11473864RIVicini Court - Women Vicini Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11510407NQ , Eye Boots - Women Eye Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11062184ETKmb Loafers - Women Kmb Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11506253QX , Stokton Sneakers - Women Stokton Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11539459TFDimattia Court - Women Dimattia Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11536238SDMiista Court - Women Miista Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11261802UB , Dolfie Loafers - Women Dolfie Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11177721DQ , Cecil Sandals - Women Cecil Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11460775HGRas Loafers - Women Ras Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11511525DM , Evaluna Court - Women Evaluna Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11538147JGTiffi Court - Women Tiffi Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11497603ALCafènoir Boots - Women Cafènoir Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11515003PQ , Tiffi Court - Women Tiffi Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11502448XN , Cult Loafers - Women Cult Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11473221EESax Loafers - Women Sax Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11511017GR , Frye Boots - Women Frye Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 44893443ND , Panella Sandals - Women Panella Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11474266MTMelluso Loafers - Women Melluso Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11534500QD , Unisa Court - Women Unisa Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11526281IOEllemme Court - Women Ellemme Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11526015EX , Stiù Boots - Women Stiù Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11461465AHElite Sandals - Women Elite Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11536337OX ,
    John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

    As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

    John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

    Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

    Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

    Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

    Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

    Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

    Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

    Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

    Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

    Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

    Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

    Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

    Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

    Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

    Stella Mccartney Ankle Boot - Women Stella Mccartney Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11479085CM , AEDO 389 WEDGE-HEEL SANDALS FOR WOMEN , LQMGFCE0 men/women Kamik Shawna Boots excellentConverse CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR OX Orange / CoralGiuseppe Di Dato Ankle Boot - Women Giuseppe Di Dato Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11552934BFSgn Giancarlo Paoli Ankle Boot - Women Sgn Giancarlo Paoli Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11545822SE , Adidas Originals Superstar 80S - Sneakers - Men Adidas Originals Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11082081TNLadies Valentino Nude Pnk 11 Sandals Superior qualityCAFE NOIR Fd921 BOTíN PLANO DE MUJER , Men/Women Lucchese McKinley Boots Reliable performance , Versus Versace Mules - black , The North Face Bridgeton Wedge Bootie , SKECHERS Mesh High Apex Bungee Slip-On , Wide fit velvety heels, sizes 38-45 , black, CastalunaReplay Loafers - Women Replay Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11493219PF , Fabi Sneakers - Men Fabi Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11532102NR , Vans Sneakers - Men Vans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11362884OC , Adidas Sneakers - Men Adidas Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11547009PG , Mckanty Boots - Men Mckanty Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11535812GK , Lotto STRATOSPHERE IV CLY - Outdoor tennis shoes - blue /white , Janet Sport Boots - Women Janet Sport Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11519232WN , Cavallini Ankle Boot - Women Cavallini Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11455034TVRoger Vivier Court - Women Roger Vivier Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11501719DDAquazzura Ankle Boot - Women Aquazzura Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11528203UGChristian Louboutin Black Gortika Zoulou SandalsEürosoft by Söfft Black 1222131 SandalsWEomRsXp C.DOUX 7718 SHOES FOR WOMENNaturalizer Pippa Pull off your most posh look yet in the polished Pippa pump from Naturalizer , womens Manolo Blahnik Navy Sandals First class in his classwoman Tory Burch Chestnut/Tan Chandler Sandals Excellent performance
    Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
    BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

    Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

    Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

    At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

    Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

    Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


    The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.