United Liberty
John Paul Stevens
On Every Question of Construction

A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

TRISOLES antiinfla-16759 2040 FASHION FOR FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMEN 133e3b5
Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

“It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

— Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
TRISOLES 126 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMENPAKERSON 25153 LOW-TOP TRAINERS FOR WOMEN , FIARDI 355 PLATFORM SANDALS FOR WOMEN , GEOX D641eg-geox LOW-TOP TRAINERS FOR WOMENPITILLOS 1094 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMEN , ALCE 8380 FASHION BOOTS FOR WOMENOTAZUA 7286 ZAPATO CONFORT DE MUJERCOOLWAY Papaya PLATFORM SANDALS FOR WOMEN , SHLEP 007624 FASHION LOAFERS FOR WOMENSHLEP 007618 FASHION FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN , FIARDI 1808 PLATFORM SANDALS FOR WOMENVAGN BLACS 171010 ZAPATILLA CON PLATAFORMA , TITI COUTURE Moccasin SLIPPER PARA MUJERTITI COUTURE Tich01no MENORQUINA PARA MUJERTITI COUTURE Ticc07va MENORQUINA PARA MUJER , TITI COUTURE Timw01po MENORQUINA PARA MUJER , TITI COUTURE Tich07po MENORQUINA PARA MUJER , TITI COUTURE Timw01no MENORQUINA PARA MUJER , TITI COUTURE Tich07no MENORQUINA PARA MUJERTITI COUTURE Ticc05no MENORQUINA PARA MUJERTITI COUTURE Timw01va MENORQUINA PARA MUJERTITI COUTURE Ticc02va MENORQUINA PARA MUJER , TITI COUTURE Ticc07po MENORQUINA PARA MUJERALCE 9129 ZAPATO PLANO PARA MUJER , VICTORIA 50105 ZAPATO PLANO PARA MUJER , VICTORIA 40103 LOW-TOP TRAINERS FOR WOMENOTAZUA 6980 FASHION FOOTWEAR FOR WOMENSONNAX 26020 LOW-TOP TRAINERS FOR WOMEN , TITI COUTURE Ticc01va MENORQUINA PARA MUJER
John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

Roberto Cavalli Sandals - Women Roberto Cavalli Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11458865GILiviana Conti Court - Women Liviana Conti Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11518085TJ , womens Birkenstock Black/White Sandals Stable quality , Chie By Chie Mihara Bebe - Court - Women Chie By Chie Mihara Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11429523JE , Liu ?Jo Shoes Court - Women Liu ?Jo Shoes Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11366035XUWOMEN Balmain Olive Giuseppe Zanotti Sandals Win the praise of customersRIVIERABONUCCI Sandalias Plataforma Mujer Piel Ja5210fc92-dorado SHOES FOR WOMEN , Dr. Scholl's Eden - Original CollectionDonald J. Pliner Brown/Silver Suede Wooden SandalsMika leather ankle boots , beige, Bunker , La Sportiva BLADE GTX - Walking boots Colour: carbon/green , men/women Nine West Onlee3 Flats Not so expensiveGaudì Boots - Men Gaudì Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11549670SUCandice Cooper PLUS 04 - High-top trainers Colour: cardiff legno/base tamp tortoraMen/Women Giuseppe Zanotti RS80050 Sneakers & Athletic Giuseppe Zanotti Preferred material , Adidas DNA Footwear BV High heeled ankle boots - grey , Adidas Melvin & Hamilton SUSAN - Ankle boots - black , Gianfranco Lattanzi Sneakers - Men Gianfranco Lattanzi Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11513227KDMen/Women New Balance XC900 v4 Sneakers & Athletic New Balance Diversified new design , Millà Sandals - Women Millà Sandals online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11509747MTAvirex Sneakers - Women Avirex Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11522135IQDsquared2 Court - Women Dsquared2 Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11391140IELorbac Court - Women Lorbac Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11502572LUDsquared2 Court - Women Dsquared2 Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11324741VF , Chiara Ferragni Sneakers - Women Chiara Ferragni Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11548331DBNine West Floral Black Slingback Sandals , Easy life Lowa Phoenix Mesh LoOfficial website Allen Edmonds StrandfclEriIi Women's S Platforms Low priceLADY Givenchy Light Blue Pumps Fine workmanship ,
Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.