United Liberty
John Paul Stevens
On Every Question of Construction

A couple of items in the news lately have brought the judiciary back into the consciousness of the American public; the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the recent decision by federal judge Barbara Crabb in Wisconsin in which she ruled that the National Day of Prayer is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the rulings of both justices we find an egregious disrespect for the plain meaning of the Constitution, and it is a failure of the American people to learn the Constitution that has allowed us to stray so far.

As a nation, we have reached a point where we bestow upon the courts an unjustified level of deference to their perceived wisdom. In fact, the Founding Fathers created the judiciary to be the weakest of the three branches, vested as they are with lifetime appointments.

Thomas Jefferson wrote (in a letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820) that “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so.” Yet today we have allowed the courts to be elevated to the level of an oligarchy, where we accept rulings that are clearly unaligned with the Constitution without so much as a whimper.

Chloé By White and Jungle Green Sonnie Sonnie Buckle Sneakers By 26882 Sneakers a7813ab
Today in Liberty: Cantor unwilling to fight for Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, Obama’s 442 tax hike proposals

“It is impossible to enumerate a priori all the rights we have; we usually go to the trouble of identifying them only when someone proposes to limit one or another. Treating rights as tangible claims that must be limited in number gets the whole concept wrong.” — David Boaz (Politics of Freedom: Taking on The Left, The Right and Threats to Our Liberties)

— Cantor backing away from cronyism: The Hill notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor isn’t going to spend political capital over the reauthorization of the controversial Export-Import Bank, a government-backed entity known for rampant cronyism. (They also read websites which mention them, at least that’s what our Google Analytics reports tell us.) “Cantor…has privately told members he does not intend to get involved this time around,” The Hill reports, “a message that some see as an indication that he is wary of battling conservatives angered by a number of his recent legislative moves.” It looks like House conservatives are going to make Ex-Im reauthorization their big issue this spring, part of a push to end corporate welfare and change the narrative about the Republican Party.

Retiring Justice stood with corporation over middle class homeowners
Converse White & Black All Star High Top Sneakers Sneakers , Blue Ovidius High-top Fashion Sneakers - Uniform Blue/White / Sneakers , Navy Blue Heather Slip with Fox Fur Pom Pom SneakersSkechers Navy Blue Interstellar Intergalactic Women's Mary 9 1/2 SneakersHender Scheme White New In Box Thick Sole Sneakers SneakersNaot Black Multi Strap Mary Janes Made In Israel Pumps , Bally Red Man High Top Sneakers Patent Leather Suede SneakersSteven by Steve Madden Rose Gold Neon Platform Sneaker Sneakers , Kenneth Cole Gray Suede Knot Detail Slip On Sneakers SneakersLands' End Teal with Black Suede Hiking Slip On SneakersWhite Carbon Fiber Cycling with Cleats Made In Italy Sneakers , Nike Black Air Jordan Xx 20 Retro Stealth 310455- SneakersGrey Black Light Blue Adt 103 Gore-tex Surround -women’s Sneakers , Nike Air Max Running Neutral Ride Soft Black Sneakers Sneakers , New Balance Gray Man Made In Usa 992 Sneakers SneakersBrooks Light and Dark Blue with White Green Silence Sneakers , Asics Yellow Plum Women's Gel Noosa Tri 9 Running Sneakers , FootJoy White Brown Men's Classics Saddle Golf Cleats Vintage Sneakers , Vans White/Red Peanuts Sk8-hi Moc Dog House Bone Casual Sneakers , Puma Pink Burnt-orange & White Women's Bowling Look-a-like Sneakers Sneakers , Chaus Limited Additon Watersn Candel Lady Peep 150 Candel/Kid/Ri Sneakers , FootJoy Brown Men's Classics Saddle Leather Golf Soft Cleats Sneakers , Reebok Gold Melody Ehsani Me Metallic Python Love Betwixt SneakersNike Red Orange Green Grey Yellow Turquoise Air Force Sneakersadidas X Yeezy White Boost 350 V2 Color Triple SneakersIvy Kirzhner Black - Lunar Rose Gold Wedge Sneakers SneakersSam Edelman New Blue Shimmer Baylee Bridal Wedding Sneaker SneakersBrown Man Steel Toe Slip/Oil Resistant Western Cowboy Work Boots/BootiesCircus by Sam Edelman White Women's Collins Watermelon Sneakers Sneakers ,
John Paul Stevens: No friend of liberty

As Justice John Paul Stevens prepares to leave the Supreme Court, Ilya Shapiro takes a look back at his career:

John Paul Stevens, the oldest-ever and (by the end of the term) second-longest-serving Supreme Court justice, has had a long career that, judging by his fitness regimen—the envy of men much younger than he—could have continued for many years yet.  Justice Stevens is to be commended for his record of service in a variety of positions in the public and private sector.

Unfortunately, the jurisprudential legacy he leaves behind is much more checkered than his personal integrity and professionalism: Justice Stevens “grew” from his country-club Republican roots to becoming the Court’s liberal lion.  While a friend of liberty in certain limited circumstances, he ultimately hangs his hat on supporting government action over the rights of individuals in contexts ranging from property rights (Kelo v. New London) to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller) to free speech (Citizens United and Texas v. Johnson, the flag-burning case) to executive agency power (Chevron).  And even on those issues where friends of liberty can disagree in good faith as a matter of policy, such as abortion and the death penalty, Stevens admittedly and unabashedly asserted his own policy preferences instead of following the law.

Republican SCOTUS Nomination Plans: A Fight, But No Filibuster

Republicans are readying themselves for a fight over the upcoming Supreme Court nomination hearings, but appear to have already taken the filibuster option off the table:

Conservative judicial activists say they won’t ask their Republican allies to go to the mat over President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens by pressing for the ultimate weapon in a court fight – a filibuster.

Instead, they say the nomination of a Democrat to the court will be an opportunity to cement the support of the tea party movement, broaden their base, and motivate supporters to turn out to support Republicans in the mid-term elections in November.

Taking the filibuster off the table is a smart idea. To put it bluntly, it’s unlikely that the 41 Republicans in the Senate will be able to stick together to filibuster the kind of “liberal but not controversial” nominee that we’re likely to see from Obama. At the very least, I would expect to see most if not all of the nine Republicans who ended up voting for Sonia Sotomayor to walk across the aisle to vote to invoke cloture should there be any attempt to filibuster. Moreover, unless Obama does surprise everyone and select someone with a controversial record, which I find unlikely, Senate Republicans would likely lose the public relations war over the nomination. Not a smart thing to do only months before a crucial mid-term election.

Stevens to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will retire this summer, giving President Barack Obama his second SCOTUS pick:

Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

Stevens’ announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to hold confirmation hearings and a vote before the court’s next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out attempts to delay confirmation.

Stevens’ announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

Appointed by Gerald Ford in 1975, Stevens has aligned himself with “liberal” wing of the Court, so with Obama making the pick the ideological divide will not be affected.

Slate already has a list of potential nominees. Whoever it is will be named quickly and they will be a safe pick. President Obama and Democrats will want to avoid a tough confirmation fight that could stretch into late summer of an election year.

Gino Sentell® Ankle Boot - Women Gino Sentell® Ankle Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11498005NB , Andìa Fora Sneakers - Women Andìa Fora Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11395438OH , Vans Karl Lagerfeld Ua Classic Slip-On - Sneakers - Women Vans Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11338790WUMagli By Bruno Magli Boots - Women Magli By Bruno Magli Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11491165QL , J|D Julie Dee Loafers - Women J|D Julie Dee Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11355497XXwomen BCBGMAXAZRIA Black Satin Ma-lilie Sandals Nice and charming , LADY Jimmy Choo Nude Bridget Pumps Crazy Price, Birmingham , Levi's? Shoes Jeffrey Hi 501 Button Your Fly , AVISPAS 2916 2416 FASHION SANDALS FOR WOMENMen/Women Nine West Burkland2 Loafers Most practicalMen/Women Aquatalia Raphael Boots high quality productTiger of Sweden ARNE - TrainersBOBS from SKECHERS Highlights - High Jinxmens/womens Adrienne Vittadini Gabi Heels elegantRIVIERAS PHOCEA - Slip-ons Colour: kaki , men's/women's Zign Sandals - black Shoes Modern technology , Grenson | Grenson Maxwell Penny Loafers In Dark Gray , men's/women's Frye Country Crepe Chukka Boots best seller , Tod's Sneakers - Men Tod's Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11540585HVGrenson Boots - Men Grenson Boots online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11505728RTVans SK8 MID REISSUE GHILL - Skate shoes - forged iron/marshmallow , Men/Women CARLOS by Carlos Santana Camilla Heels high quality product , Roberto Cavalli Sneakers - Men Roberto Cavalli Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11538944QFCarshoe Loafers - Women Carshoe Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11564305IL , Anna F. Court - Women Anna F. Courts online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11529265MT , Windsor Smith Sneakers - Women Windsor Smith Sneakers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11220404THValentino Garavani Loafers - Women Valentino Garavani Loafers online on YOOX United Kingdom - 11498606EW , BeautiFeel Beige with Pale Gold. Sandalswomens Christian Louboutin Silver Metallic Wedges Year-end sales , Dansko Blue Joanie Leather In Cobalt Sandals ,
Justice John Paul Stevens Says He Will Retire Within Three Years
BREAKING: Souter to retire from SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his retirement:

Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.

Souter’s retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.